In the winter of 2017, a whisper that began in Hollywood reverberated across oceans and continents, reaching the distant shores of Asia where millions of women had endured in silence what the world was only beginning to understand as systematic patterns of abuse, harassment, and gender-based violence. The hashtag #MeToo, initially popularized by American actress Alyssa Milano in response to revelations about film producer Harvey Weinstein, became a global rallying cry that transcended cultural, linguistic, and national boundaries in ways that its creators could never have anticipated. Yet the manner in which this movement manifested across Asian societies revealed far more than simple solidarity with Western feminists; it exposed the complex interplay between traditional cultural values, evolving understandings of gender relations, legal and institutional frameworks, and the deeply personal struggles of individuals who chose to break decades of silence at tremendous personal cost. The Asian #MeToo movement, far from being a simple replication of Western activism, represents a unique phenomenon shaped by distinct historical trajectories, patriarchal structures that often differ substantially from Western models, and the courageous efforts of local activists and survivors who have adapted global messaging to their specific contexts. This investigation into the progress and obstacles facing the Asian #MeToo movement seeks to understand not merely what has occurred in terms of accusations, legal proceedings, and policy changes, but what these developments reveal about the deeper transformations underway in Asian societies and the philosophical questions they raise about justice, memory, forgiveness, and the possibility of fundamental social change. The stories we encounter in this exploration are not merely news events but human dramas of extraordinary complexity, involving individuals who have risked everything to speak truth to power in societies where such speaking has historically carried unbearable costs.
Understanding the contemporary #MeToo movement in Asia requires excavating the historical foundations upon which current patterns of gender-based violence have been built, foundations that stretch back centuries and that continue to shape present realities in ways that many observers fail to appreciate. The patriarchal structures that characterize Asian societies are not simply imports from colonial powers or recent developments but rather deeply rooted systems that have evolved over millennia, embedding themselves in religious traditions, family structures, legal codes, and cultural practices that define acceptable behavior for men and women across generations. Confucian traditions that dominated East Asian societies for centuries established hierarchical relationships between genders that positioned women as subordinate to men, requiring obedience to fathers, husbands, and sons in sequences that left women without independent legal or economic status throughout much of recorded history. Similar patterns emerged in South and Southeast Asian societies through Hindu legal traditions, Buddhist cultural norms, and indigenous belief systems that variously consigned women to domestic spheres while granting men authority over family property, women's mobility, and in some cases women's very bodies. The colonial period that swept across Asia in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries introduced Western legal frameworks and Christian missionary ideas about gender equality, yet these imports often existed in tension with indigenous traditions, creating hybrid systems in which formal legal equality coexisted with persistent customary practices that maintained hierarchical gender relations. Post-colonial nation-building in the mid-twentieth century brought constitutional guarantees of gender equality and Women's Rights movements that achieved significant victories in education, employment, and political representation, yet the fundamental structures of male dominance proved remarkably resilient, adapting to new legal realities while maintaining their essential character through family law, workplace dynamics, and cultural expectations that constrained women's actual lived experience. This historical context is essential for understanding why the #MeToo movement has encountered both powerful support and fierce resistance across Asia, as the transformation it demands touches not merely individual behaviors but entire systems of social organization that have proven extraordinarily difficult to change despite decades of feminist activism.
The arrival of #MeToo consciousness in Asia coincided with, or perhaps triggered, a series of breakthroughs that had been building for decades beneath the surface of societies that had long prided themselves on stability and traditional values. South Korea, often considered the most Westernized of Asian societies, experienced one of the most dramatic initial eruptions of the movement, as accusations against powerful men in entertainment, academia, and politics emerged in rapid succession during early 2018, shocking a nation that had maintained elaborate fictions about gender relations despite its rapid economic development. The case of prosecutor Ahn Tae-geun, who publicly acknowledged decades of sexual misconduct and became a symbol of the rot that had infected Korean society's power structures, represented just one among hundreds of accusations that forced the nation to confront patterns of abuse that had been an open secret for generations. Similar developments unfolded across East and Southeast Asia, with movements gaining particular momentum in Japan, where the legacy of wartime sexual violence combined with contemporary workplace harassment to create fertile ground for #MeToo consciousness, and in Indonesia, where activists connected local struggles against gender-based violence to broader questions of democracy and human rights following the end of authoritarian rule. The initial breakthrough phase of Asian #MeToo was characterized by a sense of liberation, as survivors discovered through social media and traditional media that they were not alone, that their experiences were not isolated incidents but rather patterns that connected them to millions of others across the region and across the world. This discovery of solidarity proved transformative for many survivors, providing psychological validation that official institutions had long denied while simultaneously generating the public attention necessary to pressure authorities into action. Yet this initial phase also revealed the limitations of social media activism alone, as the dramatic accusations that dominated headlines gradually gave way to more complex realities involving counter-accusations, victim-blaming, and the powerful backlash that typically accompanies any significant challenge to established power structures.
The eruption of #MeToo consciousness across Asia forced legal systems and institutions that had long ignored or minimally addressed gender-based violence to respond in ways that tested their capacity for reform and their commitment to survivor justice. Legislative responses varied dramatically across the region, with some countries quickly amending existing laws to expand definitions of sexual assault, improve evidence standards, and strengthen penalties for perpetrators, while others maintained legal frameworks that reflected older assumptions about gender relations that placed women's credibility and worthiness under suspicion. Japan's revision of its century-old rape laws in 2017, before the full impact of #MeToo had been felt, represented a significant step forward that activists had long campaigned for, yet implementation remained inconsistent and conviction rates continued to reflect deeply embedded biases against survivors who came forward. South Korea enacted similar reforms that expanded the definition of sexual assault and eliminated statutes of limitations for certain crimes, representing victories that activists had achieved partly through leveraging the energy generated by #MeToo revelations. Institutional responses within workplaces proved more variable, with some companies establishing new reporting mechanisms, training programs, and zero-tolerance policies that went beyond legal requirements, while others sought to minimize liability through superficial changes that did not address underlying cultural problems. The legal and institutional response to #MeToo revealed both the possibilities and the limitations of reform through official channels, demonstrating that laws on the books do not automatically translate into justice for survivors who must navigate complex systems that often re-traumatize those who seek accountability. The courts, the police, and the disciplinary systems of employers all proved to be sites of ongoing struggle where victories were partial, reversible, and dependent on the continued pressure of activists unwilling to accept half-measures as adequate resolution.
The progress of #MeToo in Asia has been impeded by cultural barriers and social resistance that often differ substantially from those encountered in Western contexts, requiring activists to develop strategies specifically tailored to their societies rather than simply adopting approaches that proved effective elsewhere. The concept of "face," central to East Asian social organization, creates particular challenges for survivors who must weigh the personal costs of speaking out against the potential damage to family honor, institutional reputation, and social standing that accusations inevitably bring regardless of their truth or validity. This cultural dynamic places enormous pressure on survivors to remain silent, as the anticipated shame of public exposure often exceeds the anticipated benefits of justice, leading many to conclude that private accommodation of abuse represents the lesser evil compared to the social costs of disclosure. Gendered expectations about appropriate female behavior further complicate matters, as survivors who report harassment often find themselves subjected to scrutiny about their clothing, their alcohol consumption, their relationships, and their character in ways that shift focus from perpetrator behavior to victim deservingness. The response of religious institutions across Asia has been particularly complex, as Buddhist, Hindu, Islamic, and Christian traditions offer varying teachings about gender relations, sexual conduct, and the appropriate response to violence against women that range from strong condemnation to implicit acceptance. In some contexts, religious leaders have become powerful allies of the movement, drawing on spiritual teachings about human dignity and equality to challenge patriarchal interpretations that have historically legitimated violence against women. In other contexts, religious institutions have defended traditional gender hierarchies against what they perceive as Western cultural imperialism, positioning #MeToo as a threat to family values and social order that must be resisted in the name of cultural authenticity. The cultural barriers facing Asian #MeToo are neither uniform nor insurmountable, but they require sustained engagement that goes beyond simple legal reform to address the deep structures of meaning that sustain gender-based violence across the region.
The true measure of the #MeToo movement in Asia cannot be found in legislative statistics or institutional policies but rather in the intimate stories of survivors who have chosen to break silence at enormous personal cost, sharing experiences that illuminate both the horrors of gender-based violence and the extraordinary courage required to speak truth to power. These voices from the margin, often marginalized by mainstream media coverage that prefers dramatic narratives of accused perpetrators to the more complex stories of survivors navigating their healing journeys, deserve center stage in any honest assessment of what #MeToo has achieved and what remains undone. A Korean survivor who testified publicly about years of abuse by a prominent academic described the moment of revelation not as liberation but as the beginning of a prolonged struggle for recognition that would consume years of her life and permanently alter her relationships with family, friends, and colleagues who often responded with disbelief or blame. A Japanese office worker who filed one of the first major #MeToo lawsuits described the institutional retaliation she faced after reporting harassment, including demotion, exclusion, and psychological torture designed to force her withdrawal from the complaint process. An Indonesian domestic worker in the Middle East whose story helped spark regional conversations about migrant women's vulnerability described the complete isolation she experienced when her employers confiscated her phone and restricted her movement, leaving her without access to family, friends, or any form of external support. These individual stories, when gathered together, reveal patterns that transcend national boundaries while reflecting the specific contexts in which they occurred, demonstrating that gender-based violence in Asia is neither uniform nor random but rather systematically related to power structures that concentrate authority in male hands across family, workplace, and state institutions. The philosophical dimension of these stories extends beyond the immediate facts of abuse to encompass questions about memory, testimony, and the possibility of healing from trauma that cannot be resolved through legal proceedings alone but requires broader social transformation in how communities understand and respond to violence against women.
Social media and digital platforms have played an ambiguous role in the Asian #MeToo movement, providing essential tools for coordination, awareness-raising, and survivor connection while simultaneously creating new forms of risk, retaliation, and abuse that complicate the liberatory potential of digital activism. The viral nature of hashtags and trending topics allowed stories to spread across national boundaries with unprecedented speed, connecting local struggles to global movements in ways that provided both solidarity and pressure on national governments to respond to allegations that had suddenly become international concerns. Korean women used the hashtag #MeTooKorea to share experiences that had remained hidden for generations, creating archives of testimony that challenged official narratives about gender relations while building collective awareness that would have been impossible through traditional media alone. Japanese activists similarly leveraged social media to bypass mainstream outlets that had historically minimized or ignored reports of harassment, using platforms like Twitter to create networks of support and information sharing that circumvented gatekeepers who had long controlled public discourse about gender issues. However, the digital dimension of #MeToo also created new vulnerabilities, as survivors who came forward online faced organized campaigns of harassment, doxxing, and intimidation that often exceeded what they had experienced from their original abusers. The phenomenon of "counter-#MeToo" or "反メ too" in Japan and similar movements in other Asian countries used digital platforms to organize backlash against feminist activism, spreading misinformation about false accusations and promoting traditional gender values as necessary defenses against Western cultural corruption. The ambivalent legacy of digital activism suggests that technology is neither inherently liberating nor oppressive but rather a tool whose effects depend entirely on how it is deployed by different actors with different objectives in different social contexts.
The transformation that #MeToo demands cannot be achieved without the participation of men who have historically benefited from, participated in, or simply remained silent about gender-based violence across Asian societies, making the question of male allyship essential to any honest assessment of movement progress and remaining obstacles. The emergence of male voices supporting women's claims to safety and dignity has taken various forms across the region, from individual statements by prominent men acknowledging their own complicity or expressing solidarity to institutional programs designed to transform workplace cultures that have historically tolerated harassment and assault. South Korean men who joined the "Escape the Corset" movement challenged toxic masculinity norms that had constricted their own emotional expression while legitimating violence against women, demonstrating that feminist transformation benefits not only women but also men trapped in restrictive gender roles. Japanese male activists who organized support groups for men seeking to change their behavior represented a more direct intervention in patterns of abuse, creating accountability structures that aimed to prevent violence before it occurred rather than responding after harm had been done. However, the phenomenon of male allyship must be approached with appropriate caution, as some men have sought to co-opt feminist language for personal advancement while others have used allyship as a shield for continued abusive behavior that goes unrecognized because trusted male figures have been granted credibility that survivors continue to be denied. The transformation of masculinities across Asia represents a long-term project that cannot be accomplished through hashtag activism or individual declarations but requires sustained engagement with cultural meanings, institutional practices, and the everyday interactions through which gender relations are continuously reproduced. The philosophical stakes of this transformation extend beyond gender to encompass questions about human flourishing, emotional health, and the possibility of social arrangements that allow all individuals, regardless of gender, to develop their full potential without fear of violence or constraint.
The Asian #MeToo movement encompasses tremendous regional variations that reflect the diversity of cultures, political systems, and activist traditions across the world's largest and most populous continent, yet these variations exist alongside patterns of cross-border solidarity that demonstrate the possibility of collective action despite profound differences. East Asian societies like South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Hong Kong have experienced the most visible #MeToo mobilizations, shaped by shared Confucian legacies and modernizing trajectories that created particular forms of gender-based violence distinct from those found elsewhere in Asia. Southeast Asian movements have developed in the context of different historical experiences, including varied colonial legacies, diverse religious traditions, and more recent encounters with authoritarianism and democracy that have shaped the possibilities for feminist activism in each national context. South Asian #MeToo movements have emerged in societies where gender-based violence takes particular forms related to caste, religion, and family honor that differ substantially from the workplace harassment that dominated early Western coverage of the movement. Central Asian and Middle Eastern dimensions of Asian #MeToo remain less documented in English-language sources yet represent important developments that deserve attention as activists in these regions connect local struggles to broader regional and global conversations. Cross-border solidarity has taken various forms, from digital connections that allow activists to share strategies and support across national boundaries to physical gatherings that bring together women from different Asian countries to share experiences and build lasting relationships. The regional variations and cross-border connections of Asian #MeToo demonstrate both the universal dimensions of gender-based violence that transcend cultural boundaries and the specific forms that violence takes in particular contexts requiring particular strategies for addressing it.
The progress of #MeToo across Asia has triggered powerful backlash movements that seek to roll back gains, punish activists, and restore traditional gender hierarchies that the movement challenged, making the struggle against backlash as important as the original breakthrough that brought the issue to public attention. The backlash has manifested in multiple forms, from political movements that explicitly position feminism as a threat to national identity to legal and institutional efforts to weaken protections that survivors had fought to achieve through decades of activism. In South Korea, the emergence of online men's rights communities and political parties explicitly opposing feminism represented a organized backlash that capitalized on anxieties about changing gender relations, deploying rhetoric about male victimization that resonated with young men who felt left behind by social changes they had not requested. In Japan, conservative politicians and media figures have worked to minimize the significance of #MeToo allegations, portraying survivors who come forward as attention-seekers or as vehicles for foreign ideological influence threatening Japanese traditions. The legal dimension of backlash has included attempts to narrow definitions of sexual assault, impose stricter evidence requirements that make prosecution more difficult, and create new offenses for false accusations that chill reporting by making survivors uncertain about the legal risks of coming forward. The philosophical implications of this backlash extend beyond immediate policy concerns to encompass fundamental questions about social change, resistance, and the durability of transformative movements that have historically been followed by periods of retrenchment. Understanding the backlash is essential for assessing the genuine achievements of Asian #MeToo while recognizing that these achievements remain contested and potentially reversible.
The Asian #MeToo movement stands at a crossroads where hard-won achievements must be defended against backlash while new strategies are developed to address forms of gender-based violence that remain largely unacknowledged despite years of activism and advocacy. The survivors who sparked the movement continue their work in various capacities, some having found healing through the process of speaking out while others remain haunted by experiences that no legal proceeding or public acknowledgment can fully resolve. The activists who have built the infrastructure of support, education, and advocacy that sustains the movement face burnout, funding challenges, and the inevitable fatigue that accompanies prolonged struggle against deeply entrenched systems of power. The institutions that have responded to #MeToo with reforms must now implement these changes in ways that genuinely transform cultures rather than merely satisfying legal requirements while maintaining the underlying patterns that enabled abuse to flourish. The philosophical horizon of this movement extends beyond immediate concerns with harassment and assault to encompass a broader vision of gender justice that addresses the structural inequalities that make such violence possible, including economic disparities, political underrepresentation, and cultural norms that devalue women's contributions while elevating men's perspectives and experiences. The struggle continues not because the movement has failed but because the transformation it demands is so profound that its completion will require generations rather than years, making the current moment one of consolidation and preparation for the battles ahead rather than final victory or definitive defeat.
The main obstacles facing the #MeToo movement in Asia include deeply entrenched patriarchal cultural norms that normalize gender-based violence, legal systems that often fail to protect survivors or hold perpetrators accountable, social stigma that punishes survivors who come forward, and powerful backlash movements that seek to roll back progress achieved through years of activism. These obstacles vary in their specific forms across different Asian societies but share common themes related to power imbalances between genders, inadequate institutional responses to violence against women, and cultural values that prioritize family honor and social stability over individual survivor justice. The complexity of these obstacles requires multifaceted strategies that address legal reform, cultural change, institutional transformation, and ongoing support for survivors who must navigate systems that often re-traumatize those seeking help.
#MeToo has affected various Asian countries differently depending on their specific historical trajectories, cultural traditions, political systems, and feminist movement histories. South Korea experienced one of the most dramatic initial eruptions of the movement, with rapid-fire accusations against powerful men in multiple sectors creating a sense of irreversible change. Japan saw more gradual development, with initial reluctance to embrace the movement gradually giving way to more widespread activism as survivors gained confidence from international developments. Southeast Asian countries have developed movements shaped by particular contexts including diverse religious traditions, varied colonial legacies, and different relationships to authoritarianism and democracy. These variations demonstrate that #MeToo is not a uniform global phenomenon but rather a set of related movements adapted to specific local conditions.
Asian cultural values play complex and often contradictory roles in addressing gender-based violence, with some traditional teachings providing resources for challenging violence while others reinforce patterns that enable abuse. Confucian values about harmony, respect for hierarchy, and female subordination have historically legitimated gender-based violence while simultaneously providing frameworks for ethical treatment that activists can invoke to challenge specific abuses. Buddhist teachings about compassion and non-violence have been drawn upon by activists seeking to mobilize religious communities against gender-based violence, while Hindu and Islamic traditions have offered both conservative and progressive interpretations of gender relations that shape how different communities understand appropriate responses to violence. The role of cultural values is never fixed but rather continuously negotiated by activists who seek to challenge harmful practices while defending aspects of tradition that provide meaning and community for those who live within them.
Asian countries have implemented various legal reforms in response to #MeToo, including expanded definitions of sexual assault, improved evidence standards, strengthened penalties for perpetrators, and elimination of statutes of limitations for certain crimes. South Korea revised its laws to expand the definition of sexual assault and increase penalties, representing significant victories achieved partly through pressure from #MeToo activism. Japan revised its century-old rape laws in 2017 to expand definitions and lower barriers to prosecution, though implementation has remained inconsistent. Other Asian countries have similarly updated their legal frameworks, though the gap between law on the books and justice in practice remains significant across the region. Legal reform represents an important achievement but not a sufficient condition for ending gender-based violence, as implementation and cultural change require ongoing attention beyond legislative victories.
Men can become better allies in the fight against gender-based violence by educating themselves about the prevalence and impact of such violence, believing survivors who come forward, challenging harmful behaviors and attitudes among their peers, supporting policies and institutions that protect women, and examining their own behaviors and privileges to identify ways they may be contributing to gender-based violence either directly or indirectly. Genuine allyship requires sustained commitment rather than performative gestures, ongoing learning about issues they may not fully understand, and willingness to cede space and resources to women-led organizations rather than centering male perspectives in movements ostensibly dedicated to gender justice. The transformation of masculinities that true allyship requires cannot be accomplished through individual good intentions but must be supported by cultural change, institutional reforms, and accountability structures that make violence against women socially unacceptable rather than normalized.
The relationship between #MeToo and broader feminist movements in Asia is one of mutual reinforcement, with #MeToo providing visibility and energy for feminist causes while existing feminist organizations and networks provided the infrastructure and expertise necessary to sustain the movement beyond initial breakthrough moments. Asian feminist movements have decades of history that preceded #MeToo, including struggles for legal equality, educational access, political representation, and reproductive rights that established foundations upon which #MeToo could build. The movement has also generated new feminist consciousness among younger generations who may not have previously identified with feminist politics, expanding the base of support for gender justice while creating tensions between different cohorts of activists with varying perspectives and priorities. The relationship between #MeToo and feminism is neither simple nor without tensions, but rather represents a dynamic interaction that continues to evolve as movements adapt to changing circumstances.
Social media has helped the Asian #MeToo movement by providing platforms for survivor testimony that bypass traditional media gatekeepers, enabling rapid spread of information across national boundaries, creating networks of solidarity and support, and generating public pressure that forced authorities to respond to allegations that would otherwise have been ignored. However, social media has also hindered the movement by enabling organized harassment campaigns against survivors, facilitating the spread of misinformation about false accusations, providing platforms for backlash movements, and creating risks related to privacy and safety that can deter potential survivors from coming forward. The ambivalent legacy of social media suggests that digital platforms are neither inherently liberating nor oppressive but rather tools whose effects depend on how they are used by different actors with different objectives.
Support systems for survivors of gender-based violence in Asia include government-provided services such as hotlines, shelters, and legal aid, non-governmental organizations that provide counseling, advocacy, and emergency assistance, religious institutions that offer spiritual support and sometimes practical resources, and community-based networks that provide informal assistance to survivors within local contexts. The quality and accessibility of these support systems varies dramatically across the region, with some countries providing comprehensive services while others offer minimal support that leaves survivors to navigate trauma without professional assistance. The #MeToo movement has strengthened some existing support systems while also revealing gaps that require new resources and approaches. The development of adequate support systems remains an ongoing challenge that requires sustained investment and attention from governments, civil society organizations, and communities throughout Asia.
The long-term prospects for gender equality in Asia are neither uniformly positive nor negative but rather represent a complex picture of progress in some areas alongside persistent challenges in others. Significant gains have been achieved in education, employment, and political representation across the region, with women now exceeding men in educational attainment in many Asian countries and achieving unprecedented levels of political leadership in some contexts. However, gender-based violence remains pervasive, women remain underrepresented in leadership positions despite educational gains, and cultural attitudes about appropriate gender roles have proven remarkably resistant to change despite decades of activism. The long-term prospects depend heavily on continued activism, policy reform, cultural change, and the emergence of new generations who have internalized gender equality values more fully than their predecessors. The current moment represents neither final victory nor inevitable defeat but rather an ongoing struggle whose outcome remains uncertain and depends on the choices made by individuals, institutions, and societies throughout the region.
International organizations can support Asian #MeToo efforts by providing funding for local NGOs and activist organizations, sharing best practices and comparative knowledge about effective strategies, pressuring governments to meet international human rights standards, amplifying survivor voices that might otherwise be ignored, and creating platforms for cross-border solidarity and learning. The United Nations, international NGOs, and bilateral donor agencies all have roles to play in supporting local efforts while avoiding the imposition of externally derived approaches that may not fit specific Asian contexts. Effective international support requires genuine partnership with local organizations rather than top-down programming, recognition of Asian feminist expertise and leadership, and sustained commitment that extends beyond momentary media attention to provide the long-term resources necessary for fundamental social transformation.
The analysis presented in this report draws upon a wide range of academic sources, institutional research, and expert commentary that inform our understanding of gender-based violence, feminist movements, and social change across Asia. Scholarly works on Asian feminisms provide essential theoretical frameworks for understanding how global feminist ideas have been adapted to local contexts, including collections like "Feminism and Counterpatriarchal Traditions in Third World Women" and studies published in journals such as Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society and Feminist Studies. Research on gender-based violence in Asia, including studies published by the United Nations, the Asian Development Bank, and various national statistical agencies, provides empirical grounding for understanding the prevalence and patterns of harassment and assault across the region. Legal analysis of reforms to sexual assault laws in various Asian countries appears in law journals and reports from organizations specializing in women's human rights, including the International Commission of Jurists and Human Rights Watch. Sociological and anthropological studies of changing gender relations in Asian societies provide context for understanding how #MeToo intersects with broader transformations in family structure, employment patterns, and cultural values. Activist publications and accounts from grassroots organizations offer perspectives often missing from academic literature, providing insight into the practical challenges and strategies of those doing on-the-ground work to address gender-based violence. Interdisciplinary works bridging gender studies, political science, and cultural analysis help situate Asian #MeToo within broader theoretical frameworks about social movements, institutional change, and the possibilities for transforming deeply entrenched patterns of gender inequality.
MeToo Movement in Asia: Progress and Obstacles in the Fight Against Gender-Based Violence
For more information, interviews, or additional materials, please contact the PressAsia team:
Email: [email protected]
PressAsia (PressAsia Release Distribution Network) is dedicated to providing professional press release writing and distribution services to clients in Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia. We help you share your stories with a global audience effectively. Thank you for reading!